Platform & Sandbox
Platform Architecture Knowledge Graph Engine Change Simulator Regulatory Intelligence Evidence Verifier Interactive CardioSense Sandbox
Solutions
Master Solutions Hub MedTech Startups Enterprise MedTech AI & SaMD Devices Regulatory Affairs Engineering & R&D Quality Assurance
Ecosystem & Resources
Integrations Ecosystem Technical Whitepapers (6) Comprehensive FAQ (27 Q&A) Security & Trust About Primexia Schedule a Briefing
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) • FDA PCCP & EU AI Act Governance

Continuous ML Iteration Under Strict Medical Device Governance

Machine learning evolves through retraining, dataset expansion, and hyperparameter tuning. Traditional regulations expect static, frozen code. PMX OS resolves this fundamental conflict by operationalizing FDA Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCP), model drift surveillance, and complete dataset lineage.

The SaMD Conundrum

Why Traditional QMS Breaks for Machine Learning

Medical software is no longer a static binary compiled once and distributed on CD-ROM. It is an evolving cognitive pipeline.

Model Drift in Clinical Reality

When deployed across diverse clinical cohorts, physiological feature distributions shift. Without automated telemetry monitoring tied to risk files, subtle sensitivity loss remains undetected until an adverse event occurs.

The Dataset Provenance Void

Auditors now ask: "Show the exact patient raw waveform subset that produced model weights hash 0x4f82." Traditional eQMS stores PDFs of validation summaries, not immutable training data lineage.

Dual-Framework Compliance

Teams must simultaneously comply with FDA 510(k)/De Novo requirements, EU MDR Class IIa/IIb clinical evaluation rules, and the EU AI Act’s stringent Annex IV technical documentation and cybersecurity duties.

Regulatory Architecture

Operationalizing FDA Predetermined Change Control Plans

Under FDA guidance, a pre-cleared PCCP permits specific planned algorithmic modifications without submitting a new 510(k). PMX OS enforces the three statutory PCCP pillars mathematically in your knowledge graph.

01
Section A

Description of Modifications

Explicitly bounds what parameters may change: model architecture tweaks, hyperparameter bounds, and input preprocessing filters. PMX OS flags any commit attempting changes outside these authorized graph constraints.

02
Section B

Modification Protocol

Defines verification protocols, ground-truth annotation rules, and clinical test datasets. PMX OS automatically verifies that retraining runs satisfy statutory acceptance thresholds (e.g. AUROC ≥ 0.96, specificity ≥ 98%).

03
Section C

Impact Assessment

Links the proposed modification directly to ISO 14971 risk nodes. Confirms that algorithmic shifts introduce no new hazards and do not alter the primary Indications for Use (IFU).

Case In Point

CardioSense Pro: Arrhythmia Detection Neural Net Upgrade

Executing an algorithm upgrade (v2.4 to v2.5) safely within authorized PCCP boundaries.

ML Pipeline Event

Atrial Fibrillation Convolutional Upgrade

The data science team at CardioSense Pro developed an updated 1D convolutional neural network (ALG-ECG-02 v2.5) trained on 14,000 newly annotated Holter monitor segments to reduce false positives in ambulatory pediatric patients.

In a traditional device company, submitting this change would trigger an immediate executive debate: "Does this require a full Special 510(k) or can we Letter-to-File?" Months of paralysis typically ensue.

PMX OS Verification Graph

PCCP Protocol 3 Traversal

PMX OS evaluated the model PR directly against pre-cleared PCCP Protocol 3 in clearance K221840:

[PCCP CHECK] Sensitivity ≥ 98.5% : 99.1% [PASS]
[PCCP CHECK] Latency ≤ 180ms on Edge MCU : 142ms [PASS]
[DATASET PROVENANCE] Dataset DS-PEDIATRIC-2026 hash verified [PASS]
[OUTCOME] Retraining satisfies PCCP envelope. No new 510(k) required.

The system auto-generated an immutable verification dossier and logged it to the active DHF.

Global AI Governance

Harmonizing EU AI Act & EU MDR Conformity

Software as a Medical Device classified under MDR Class IIa/IIb automatically falls under High-Risk AI System rules under Annex I of the EU AI Act.

EU AI Act Statutory Duty Operational Burden PMX OS Automated Solution
Risk Management System (Article 9) Continuous risk management across entire AI lifecycle Bidirectional semantic linkage between training anomalies and ISO 14971 risk files
Data & Data Governance (Article 10) Data provenance, bias mitigation, and demographic stratification Cryptographic dataset hashing, patient cohort breakdown charts, and lineage graphs
Technical Documentation (Article 11) Comprehensive system architecture and training parameters Auto-compiled Annex IV technical file ready for Notified Body conformity inspection
Human Oversight (Article 14) Mechanisms to prevent automation bias and clinical override controls Documented clinician confirmation nodes linked directly to SaMD GUI state machines
Modern SaMD Engineering

Deploy Safe, Governed Medical AI Without Regulatory Friction

Talk with our medical AI regulatory engineers to see how PMX OS handles PCCP authoring, model versioning, and automated dataset audits.